Lincoln A Visionary And Ethical Leader Essay - 1752 Words

In 1865, Abraham stood to deliver his Second Inaugural Address facing a population weary from war, divided by slavery, and in desperate need of a vision. In this moment, Lincoln stated â€Å"with malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right...to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations† (Yale Law School, 2008). In these words, Lincoln articulates an ethical and optimistic vision for all Americans. Although his words are inspirational, Lincoln’s actions, behaviors, and decisions far better judge his extraordinary leadership. Regarding actions, behaviors, and decisions, Abraham Lincoln is a shining example of a visionary and ethical leader. In his words, actions, and decisions, Lincoln embodied the visionary leader concept throughout his presidency, managing diversity and influencing change despite massive resistance. During this same period, Lincoln fur ther personified the qualities of an ethical leader, specifically in handling a divisive ethical dilemma. Thus, it is imperative leaders, myself included, consider and reflect upon Abraham Lincoln’s leadership as a guide in their own development. In doing so, a leader discovers powerful and resonating skills to inspire people, shape organizations, and craft a better tomorrow. Visionary Leader As a visionary leader, Lincoln understood the nation was desperate for a unifying vision and a leader capable ofShow MoreRelatedAbraham Lincoln : A Visionary And Ethical Leader1834 Words   |  8 PagesAmerican historians have portrayed Abraham Lincoln as a visionary and ethical leader. Indeed, his opposition to slavery and push for emancipation perhaps made him the statesman best suited to lead the nation during its most tragic time in history. No other U.S. President had ever, or has since, faced the dilemma of leading the country in the midst of an intense Civil War. The purpose of this essay is to show how Lincoln was both a visionary and ethical leader and why that is relevant to me. FirstRead MoreAbraham Lincoln, A Visionary And Ethical Leader2427 Words   |  10 Pages Abraham Lincoln, a Visionary and Ethical Leader MSgt Robert Miller Air Force Senior Noncommissioned Officer Academy Abraham Lincoln, a Visionary and Ethical Leader Have you ever been in a work center that was fundamentally divided? How did you handle it? Abraham Lincoln was a visionary and ethical leader when our country was critically divided by the issues of states’ rights and slavery. In this paper, I will show how Lincoln used critical thinking to determine the root cause of that divisionRead MoreSynthesis Essay - Abraham Lincoln. As A Leader, Do You1712 Words   |  7 PagesSynthesis Essay - Abraham Lincoln As a leader, do you feel as though you could unite subordinates, units, organizations, or even a nation? Abraham Lincoln faced the task of reunifying a nation, even during a time of civil war. He was a visionary leader through the war as his actions advocated intellectual stimulation through change management leading to decisions that shaped innovative efforts within the United States Air Force (USAF) today. Additionally, Lincoln was an ethical leader, not for the actionsRead MoreThe Legacy Of Abraham Lincoln Essay1547 Words   |  7 PagesAbraham Lincoln When you think of a past president, what exactly do you think? Do you think about what made them a great president or what made them a not so great president? In the eyes of many, Abraham Lincoln our 16th President was considered one of our greatest presidents. During Lincoln’s presidential era, slavery was alive and thriving as a successful business. Lincoln didn’t completely have the same feelings as others about slavery; he viewed slaves as people and not by the color of theirRead MorePresident Lincoln As A Visionary Leader1197 Words   |  5 PagesAbraham Lincoln Imagine how the state of the world will be today without the leadership of the United States of America to police the world. Think about Iraq during Saddam Hussein’s regime, Libya during Arafat’s regime and the behaviors like Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Had it not been the vision of Abraham Lincoln to preserve the Union, there would not have been a strong unified United States today. President Abraham Lincoln was a visionary leader and an ethical leader when leadingRead MoreVisionary Leader And Ethical Leader1559 Words   |  7 Pages Visionary Leader / Ethical Leader Synthesis Essay MSgt John C. Filbert United States Air Force Senior Non-Commissioned Officer Academy Instructor: MSgt Jennifer Johnson, 6 Sep 2014 â€Æ' â€Å"Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal† (Lincoln 1863). Most Americans recognize the Gettysburg address and our minds recall Abraham Lincoln, a master of diction and a stellarRead MoreDaniel Shays Would you work for a government that expected you to put your life in jeopardy, did1000 Words   |  4 Pagesskill sets. Much can be said about this man, was he a visionary leader? In Main Point 1 we will explore his abilities. Some may be on the fence about it. In Main Point 2 we will decide if he was ethical? Despite his situation, some may agree, even though blood was shed. Finally, I will wrap up this essay in Main Point 3 and point out how this information is relevant to me. According to The Center for Visionary Leadership, â€Å"Visionary leaders are the builders of a new dawn, working with imaginationRead MoreAnalysis Of Clara Barton s The American Red Cross 1486 Words   |  6 Pageshumanitarian. Clara not only did what was right but encouraged and inspired others to do the same. She was without a doubt a visionary and ethical leader. First this essay will enlighten on how Clara effectively utilized Full Range Leadership and Diversity principles to make her footprin t, then it describe how her leadership is personally relevant to me. Visionary Leader Clara Barton was persistent and did not give up at the first sign of adversity. Clara Barton dedicated her life to the serviceRead MoreLeadership As An Effective Leader2076 Words   |  9 Pagesexecutives must be equipped with the proper skills in order to be effective leaders in the field. Dye and Garman (2006) highlight various critical competencies all healthcare executives should harness in order to be influential leaders in their present or future leadership role. Some competences may come natural to individuals, while others have to be developed and strengthened over time. Leaders are faced with challenges such as ethical dilemmas, budgetary cuts and organizational restructuring. FurthermoreRead MoreMax Webers Iron Cage For Bureaucracy1521 Words   |  7 Pageshis or her power to benefit only a certain group of elites (Morgan, 2006). A charismatic leader has the talent through formal authority to drive their members into performing. According to Morgan (2006), proclaimed, â€Å"a hero figure may acquire immense charismatic power that allows that person to control and direct others as he or she wishes† (p. 168). Abraham Lincoln is example of a charismatic leader during his time in office while speaking to troops or from the gathering of crowds during general

Utilitarianism, Utilitarianism And Rule Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism has some positive aspects and some problems within the theory, like any theory. There are ways to try to improve it by creating act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism. J.J.C. Smart of La Trobe University evaluates the difference between the two and their inevitability. He also inspects how consequentialism is going to hurt the theory of utilitarianism. Also, Rawls is going to propose a solution to this problem. His theory, Justice as Fairness, seeks to have everyone be seen as an equal in the world. Although this could solve a few of utilitarianism’s problems, it also creates new ones. First, utilitarianism is the belief that an act is morally just if the outcome benefits the majority of people, providing utility. In theory, utilitarianism is inherently great, therefore there should be little debate on whether an action is morally acceptable if it benefited the most amount of people. In broad situations this is suitable, but there are a few times where util itarianism is immoral. This includes tyranny of the majority, impersonality, and the fact that it is reliant on the results that take place from an action, not the intentions of the action. The first reason mentioned is the biggest flaw that utilitarianism poses. The tyranny of the majority is when there is a decision whether to do an action or not. This decision will be made by determining whether the most people in the population want the action to be done. If more people want the action done thanShow MoreRelatedUtilitarianism : Utilitarianism And Rule Utilitarianism871 Words   |  4 PagesUtilitarianism, which is also called consequentialism, is a theory in normative ethics. It is one of the best known and most influential moral theories. The main idea of utilitarianism is to determine whether actions are morally good or bad, right or wrong depends on their consequences rather than intentions. (Moreland 1) In order to understand utilitarianism, it is important to learn about Jeremy Bentham, who is the influential philosopher represented utilitarianism the best. The utilitarianismRead MoreUtilitarianism, Utilitarianism And Rule Utilitarianism980 Words   |  4 Pag esother one is utilitarianism. The former follow the idea that the consequences of you action hold no importance in what we ought to do. But rather, some actions are morally wrong or good by itself. The latter follows an opposite view in which the consequences of an action are what it makes an action moral. Specially, if that action produce the greatest happiness over unhappiness. In this essay I will focus on two Utilitarianism ramifications, act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. They both agreeRead MoreAct Utilitarianism And Rule Utilitarianism978 Words   |  4 Pagesgreatest amount of pleasure to a situation: act and rule utilitarianism. I will define both act and rule utilitarianism, give a situation where both can be applied, and respond to an objection of utilitarianism. I will also be discussing why I believe act utilitarianism helps more people than rule utilitarianism, in turn, becoming ‘superior’ to rule utilitarianism. 2. To begin, I will be defining both act and rule utilitarianism. In act utilitarianism, you determine the morality of an act by measuringRead MoreThe Theory Of Utilitarianism And Rule Utilitarianism952 Words   |  4 Pagesduty; you must contribute to those experiencing poverty. When applying this concept to the consequentialist theory of utilitarianism, it is important to first examine the difference between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. As Mosser explains, act utilitarianism tells us that we must question what single act would generate the greatest good. Whereas, rule utilitarianism evaluates the actions themselves and determines what would produce an outcome that institutes the greatest good. (2013Read MoreThe Moral Code : Utilitarianism And Rule Utilitarianism994 Words   |  4 Pagesvirtue ethics. llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll The first, main part of my satisfactory moral code is utilitarianism which is an ethical system that focuses on overall utility or happiness in a group. There are two main types of Utilitarianism; Act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Act utilitarianism is an ethical system that defines right and wrong by looking at individual actions and seeing how much happiness these actionsRead MoreIs rule-utilitarianism preferable to act-utilitarianism Essay1772 Words   |  8 PagesIs rule-utilitarianism preferable to act-utilitarianism? Classical utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory which holds that an action can only be considered as morally right where its consequences bring about the greatest amount of good to the greatest number (where good is equal to pleasure minus pain). Likewise, an action is morally wrong where it fails to maximise good. Since it was first articulated in the late 19th Century by the likes of Jeremy Bentham and later John Stewart Mill,Read MoreRule Utilitarianism : A More Refined Version Of Act Utilitarianism Essay2058 Words   |  9 PagesRule Utilitarianism This may be considered a more refined version of Act Utilitarianism as it addresses some shortcoming of the earlier ethical theory by universalizing the situation. In this regard, rather than base the ethics of the situation on whether it will result in beneficence for the greatest number of people, it instead bases its ethics on the gain in happiness or loss if everyone worldwide carried out the action that is being judged. As applied to the subject issue, Rule UtilitarianismRead MoreCritisism for Rule and Act Utilitarianism1155 Words   |  5 Pages â€Å"Utilitarianism is the view that the supreme principle of morality is to act so as to produce as much happiness as possible, each person counting equally† (Mill, 114). By ‘happiness’, this includes anything that is pleasurable and free of pain. Simply put, utilitarianism is the theory that an action is right, as long as it produces the greatest good for the most number of people (Peetush). The central point to this theory is that one must consider every consequence before taking any action. ThereRead MoreBernard Williams Vs Rule Utilitarianism1606 Words   |  7 PagesUtilitarianism is based off of the idea that actions are right if they are beneficial and support the majority. When a person is faced with a decision, he or she must think about the consequences in terms of pleasure versus pain. That person has a moral obligation to figure out which outcome is the better one. Majority of this paper will discuss act utilitarianism versus rule utilitarianism and different philosophical objections to each. Act utilitarianism is best described as actions that lead toRead MoreThe Schiavos, Rule Utilitarianism, and Kantian Ethics Essay1269 Words   |  6 PagesRui Chaves The Schiavos, Rule Utilitarianism, and Kantian Ethics The case of â€Å"The Schiavos† is focused primarily on one member of the family, which is Terri Schiavo. Terri had been in a coma for 13 years. Although, â€Å"no one is completely sure what happened but the best guess is she suffered a heart attack† (Pierce, 64) presumably caused by her bulimia. Due to the severity of her heart attack, it left Terri with severe brain damaged which in turn left her in a persistent vegetative state which leaves

Do You Believe Evil Has A Right free essay sample

To Exist? Essay, Research Paper Do you believe evil has a right to be? My reply to this inquiry genuinely lies in the definition of exist. Webster? s Pocket Dictionary defines exist as? to hold existent being or reality. ? Now in my head this inquiry gives evil a physical quality. This physical quality implies that it can populate or decease. I do non believe immorality can make either. Evil is non mortal, nor immortal, so in my head it can non be. Evil is a status of world. It is therefore portion of society, but evil is non a definable, touchable thing with rights. It is merely a status that adult male creates on his ain free will. Evil does preside in our society and I suppose an statement could be made that world, as a whole, would be better off if immorality was non present. Unfortunately evil is present in our mundane lives and because it is non a physical stuff thing it can non be killed or decease off. We will write a custom essay sample on Do You Believe Evil Has A Right or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Do you believe yourself to be above the jurisprudence at anytime? I will specify jurisprudence to intend governmental regulations and ordinances. Man is placed in a contract with the authorities. If the authorities does non carry through it? s portion of the contract so adult male is above the jurisprudence. The Declaration of Independence provinces, ? That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these terminals, it is the Right of the People to change or to get rid of it. ? Every revolution is an illustration of the people seting themselves above the jurisprudence. Would you be willing to make anything for loves sake? This is a really deep inquiry. One must foremost analyze the definition of love. Is it? true? love? Is it a passion? Will the fire die out over clip? Now lend yourself to the significance of anything. Anything is a wide scope. It includes prevarication, rip offing and stealing. It could include decease. I do non believe this is something I am willing to perpetrate myself to. Even for loves sake I would non take my ain life, or the life of another individual. One should analyze their scruples and weigh their options before they commit to such a bold statement. Does a individual? s deserving derive from who they are or from what they do? This inquiry seems to circle around itself. I believe that a individual? s worth is derived from what they do. However, to further this statement I would state that who they are is defined by what they do. This leaves a span between a individual? s worth and who they are. Possibly all three are intertwined. The manner world measures a individual? s worth has a definite correlativity with what world sees that individual do. However, people choose to make things based on their involvements, passions, demands and wants, all of which make a individual who they are. Is there a difference between rational enquiry and simple wonder? Specifying the differences between rational enquiry and simple wonder is hard. I would state that rational enquiry implies that adult male is seeking to spread out upon the cognition he already has. Intellectual enquiry is end oriented. You set the end based on the cognition you already have. On the other manus simple wonder is besides the quest for cognition but it seems to be based on naivete. Simple wonder is a more free-wheeling procedure. It merely takes you to wherever it leads. You are merely seeking to larn something, but non because you already have a background of information to utilize with it. Would you be willing to take part in a revolution? This inquiry correlates with the 2nd inquiry in many ways. I once more cite the Declaration of Independence, ? when a long train of maltreatments and trespasss, prosecuting invariable the same object evinces a design to cut down them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their responsibility, to throw off such Government. ? Man must recognize that revolting becomes necessary when such discourtesy is taken toward the common good of world. When the authorities does non carry through it? s responsibilities so it is the people obligation to revolt against this authorities. Every adult male should be willing to take part in a revolution. In what sort of community would you wish to populate? This is the easiest inquiry I have to face. I could non inquire for a better community than I live in at the present clip. I love my place. My neighbours are caring and respectful. They help out when needed and they support and defend each other. My community at place is thoughtful and sort. They are difficult working people who do non allow work take over their lives. They are loving, parent-like figures to all the kids of the vicinity. My neighbours approach undertakings as a squad, maintain the country clean, and impart a their custodies to the aged members of the country. I want to populate in the community I am surrounded by right now. I love my neighbours. 359

Lilian Fadermans Queer

Lilian Faderman’s main argument centered on the thesis that some members of the gay and lesbian community â€Å"have realized the political power that is inherent in renaming oneself, and the effectiveness of taking a word and diffusing its sting through claiming it as your own† (Faderman, 2004, p.543). She was referring to the word â€Å"queer† and how it had evolved as a pejorative term hurled at gays and lesbians to a term that was accepted by the gay and lesbian community.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Lilian Faderman’s Queer specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The first time Faderman heard the word queer, she was still in elementary school. She did not know its meaning. But when she embraced the lesbian lifestyle, she learned to hate the significance of this word in her life. The reason of her annoyance is linked to the fact that â€Å"queer† was a term used as an insult. Sh e was also offended because the word had nonsexual connotations that exemplified concepts related to the terms weird, eccentric and suspicious. The gay and lesbian community was not the first to use this strategy. Faderman acknowledged the fact that it was the African-American community who first utilized this tactic when they adopted the term â€Å"black† and coined slogans to diffuse the negative impact of the above mentioned word. A good example of the slogan was a phrase â€Å"Black is beautiful.† Faderman added that by using this stratagem, the aggrieved party was able to take the power of the pejorative term to hurt and transform it into a mechanism used to heal wounded feelings and injured pride. Faderman also pointed out that the lesbian and gay communities were not limited to the word queer when it came to the need to transform the meaning of a derogatory word. In the past, there were other labels that gay and lesbian attempted to redefine and finally succeede d to do. However, Faderman said that even if many claimed victory in this subject matter, it must have been made clear that there were other members of the gay and lesbian community who objected to the use of the term. The impact of the word created a discomfort within them, and they argued that they still considered the term as an insult to themselves and their identity. Faderman, however, made the testimony that for those who embraced the word queer, the reaction could be divided into two different groups. The first group reacted in a way that resulted in lessening the impact of the pejorative term. The second group, on the other hand, used the term as a battle cry.Advertising Looking for essay on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More With regards to the second group, they created a new community with an advocacy. They named their organization Queer Nation. It was reminiscent of the radical militant tactics of the 1960s. Representatives of the second group argued that there was a need to replace the term gay. In the past, the word gay was used as defiant label, but today, its meaning and connotation have changed to suggest that the term exclude blacks, poor people and women. Faderman ended the article by saying that the new term became a fighting word. The intended effect is not only to mitigate the negative impact of the pejorative word. In some quarters, the word queer was not just a battle cry but became a word of pride and a warning to heterosexuals that members of the gay and lesbian community are not going to compromise what they believe in. Reference Faderman, L. (2004). Exploring language. PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. This essay on Lilian Faderman’s Queer was written and submitted by user Bruno Ward to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Was Brutus the Noblest Roman of Them All free essay sample

Was Brutus the noblest roman of all? â€Å"This was the noblest roman of them all† Mark Anthony said about Brutus in the play Julius Caesar, after Brutus had killed himself at the battle of Philippi. Although Brutus had participated in the assassination of Julius Caesar, Mark Anthony, Julius’s nephew, was praising Brutus as a noble person. But how was he noble? In the beginning of the play, we meet Brutus, a highly respected, much loved, senator of Rome. He loved Rome as a republic and he has a good life until he is led astray by Cassius. When he becomes embroiled in the assassination of Caesar, he is very reluctant to do so. In the way he acted, you could tell he has sleepless nights over what he should do. He decided to kill Caesar for the good of Rome. We will write a custom essay sample on Was Brutus the Noblest Roman of Them All? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This is an important point. One of the reasons why Brutus was noble is that he did not assassinate him for personal gain, but for the greater good, the good of Rome. Unlike the other conspirators, he was not envious, and acted in his best intentions. He had no bad motives. He thought he was right, so he went with his decision instead of being indecisive and cowardly. These reasons show that he was an honourable and noble man. He was popular which shows he was a good man as large numbers of ordinary citizens would not side with a bad man. In the scene when the conspirators plotted the assassination, Brutus said that they should not disrespect Caesar’s body by chopping limbs off but to give him a funeral and to make sure his body was like â€Å"a dish fit for the gods. † He also said not to kill Mark Anthony as he was not dangerous and that he wanted Caesars death to be a sacrifice, not a bloodbath. This shows he was a caring person and didn’t fit the persona of â€Å"murderer† unlike the other conspirators, who were all keen on killing Mark Anthony and who couldn’t care less about Caesar’s body. Brutus is trusted with Cassius’s secrets about the weaknesses of Caesar in an effort to turn Brutus against Caesar in a pang of jealousy and anger at Caesar for getting famous, while Cassius wasn’t. Cassius plants into Brutus’s head that he and Caesar are equal and that Caesar is just a weak coward. During the assassination of Caesar, Caesar took all the knife wounds caused by the other conspirators, but, when he saw Brutus with a knife in his hand he cried out â€Å"Et tu, Brute? (Even you, Brutus? )- Then fall Caesar! † This shows that he was very shocked at the best friend betraying him, because he was normally very loyal. After the assassination, Brutus speaks to the crowd, who were demanding an explanation. He was a good orator and when he justifies his reasons to kill Caesar he says If, then, that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. This shows that he was truly noble as it proves he did it for all the right reasons. He also allowed Anthony to speak at Caesars funeral. While it was a dangerous decision, it was also a brave decision. However Anthony swings the crowd over to his side and he partners with Octavius to get revenge on the conspirators. Meanwhile, Brutus and Cassius are h aving an argument. Brutus is accusing Cassius of taking bribes, and therefore undoing the goodness that Brutus thought that killing Caesar had done. He accuses Cassius of having â€Å"an itchy palm. † This shows that he was righteous and he loved by high standards. At the end Brutus kills himself, by running on a sword, rather than being captured and then paraded as a disgrace. In roman times, killing yourself would be the noble thing to do. However, he had his flaws, his main one was being too trusting, which led to his downfall. Following this evidence above, it is conclusive that he was a very noble man. He was trustworthy honest, mostly loyal, caring and honourable. His flaws are greatly outnumbered by his good deeds, to the extent that even his enemies accepted his nobility after Mark Anthony was avenged. Brutus was a reluctant conspirator, a clever man and decisively noble.

Biography of Horace Greeley

Biography of Horace Greeley The legendary editor Horace Greeley was one of the most influential Americans of the 1800s. He founded and edited the New York Tribune, a  substantial and very popular newspaper of the period. Greeleys opinions, and his daily decisions on what constituted news impacted American life for decades. He was not an ardent abolitionist, yet he was opposed to slavery, and he was involved in the founding of the Republican Party in the 1850s. When Abraham Lincoln came to New York City in early 1860 and essentially began his run for the presidency with his address at Cooper Union, Greeley was in the audience. He became a supporter of Lincoln, and at times, especially in the early years of the Civil War, something of a Lincoln antagonist. Greeley eventually ran as a major candidate for president in 1872, in an ill-fated campaign which left him in very poor health. He died soon after losing the 1872 election. He wrote countless editorials and several books, and is perhaps best known for a famous quote he probably did not originate: â€Å"Go west, young man.† A Printer in His Youth Horace Greeley was born on February 3, 1811, in Amherst, New Hampshire. He received irregular schooling, typical of the time, and became an apprentice at a newspaper in Vermont as a teenager. Mastering the skills of a printer, he worked briefly in Pennsylvania and then moved to New York at the age of 20. He found a job as a newspaper compositor, and within two years he and a friend opened their own print shop. In 1834, with another partner, Greeley founded a magazine, the New Yorker,  a journal devoted to literature, the arts and sciences. The New York Tribune For seven years he edited his magazine, which was generally unprofitable. During this period he also worked for the emerging Whig Party. Greeley wrote leaflets, and at times edited a newspaper, the Daily Whig. Encouraged by some prominent Whig politicians, Greeley founded the New York Tribune in 1841, when he was 30. For the next three decades, Greeley would edit the newspaper, which came to have a profound influence on the national debate. The dominant political issue of the day, of course, was slavery, which Greeley adamantly and vocally opposed. A Prominent Voice in American Life Greeley was personally offended by the sensationalist newspapers of the period and worked to make the New York Tribune a  credible newspaper for the masses. He sought out good writers and is said to be the first newspaper editor to provide bylines for writers. And Greeley’s own editorials and commentaries drew enormous attention. Though Greeley’s political background was with the fairly conservative Whig Party, he advanced opinions which deviated from Whig orthodoxy. He supported womens rights and labor and opposed monopolies. He hired early feminist  Margaret Fuller to write for the Tribune, making her the first female newspaper columnist in New York City. Greeley Shaped Public Opinion in the 1850s In the 1850s Greeley published editorials denouncing slavery, and eventually supported full abolition. Greeley wrote denunciations of the Fugitive Slave Act, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Dred Scott Decision. A weekly edition of the Tribune  was shipped westward, and it was very popular in rural parts of the country. Its believed that Greeleys hardening opposition to slavery helped shape public opinion in the decade leading up to the Civil War. Greeley became one of the founders of the Republican Party and was present as a delegate at its organizing convention in 1856. Greeleys Role in Lincolns Election At the 1860 Republican Party convention, Greeley was denied a seat in the New York delegation because of feuds with local officials. He somehow arranged to be seated as a delegate from Oregon and sought to block the nomination of New York’s William Seward, a former friend. Greeley supported the candidacy of Edward Bates, who had been a prominent member of the Whig Party. But the tempestuous editor eventually put his influence behind Abraham Lincoln. Greeley Challenged  Lincoln Over Slavery During the Civil War Greeley’s attitudes were controversial. He originally believed the southern states should be allowed to secede, but he eventually came to support the war fully. In August 1862 he published an editorial titled â€Å"The Prayer of Twenty Millions† that called for the emancipation of the slaves. The title of the famed editorial was typical of Greeleys presumptuous nature, as it indicated that the entire population of the northern states shared his beliefs. Lincoln Responded  Publicly to Greeley Lincoln wrote a response, which was printed on the front page of the New York Times on August 25, 1862. It contained an oft-quoted passage: â€Å"If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could do it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that.† By that time, Lincoln had decided to issue the Emancipation Proclamation. But he would wait until he could claim military victory after the Battle of Antietam in September before proceeding Controversy at the End of the Civil War Horrified by the human cost of the Civil War, Greeley advocated peace negotiations, and in 1864, with Lincoln’s approval, he traveled to Canada to meet with Confederate emissaries. The potential thus existed for peace talks, but nothing came of Greeleys efforts. After the war Greeley offended a number of readers by advocating amnesty for Confederates, even going so far as to pay for a bail bond for Jefferson Davis. Troubled Later Life When Ulysses S. Grant was elected president in 1868 Greeley was a supporter. But he became disillusioned, feeling Grant was too close to New York political boss Roscoe Conkling. Greeley wanted to run against Grant, but the Democratic Party was not interested in having him as a candidate. His ideas helped to form the new Liberal Republican Party, and he was the party’s candidate for president in 1872. The 1872 campaign was particularly dirty, and Greeley was viciously criticized and mocked. He lost the election to Grant, and it took a terrible toll on him. He was committed to a mental institution, where he died on November 29, 1872. Greeley is best remembered today for a quote from an 1851 editorial in the New York Tribune: Go west, young man. It has been said that Greeley thus inspired many thousands to set out for the frontier. The most likely story behind the famous quote is that Greeley had reprinted, in the New York Tribune, an editorial by John B.L. Soule which contained the line, Go west, young man, go west. Greeley never claimed to have coined the original phrase, though he later expanded upon it by writing an editorial with the phrase, Go west young man, and grow up with the country. And over time the original quote was usually attributed to Greeley.

Drug Violence in Mexico Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Drug Violence in Mexico - Research Paper Example Mexican drug trafficking is not a new item in the history of the country; the country has since Prohibition years of 1917-1933 been exporting illegal substances to the United States, and even before that, in Civil War years, was seen as one of the major suppliers of opiates, including morphine and heroin used to treat soldiers (Gonzalez). Though drugs have been commonly used in Mexico during this time, even though they were exported to the United States, they were still only being used for medical purposes, therefore the government saw no need to regulate or otherwise deter their uses. If there were addicts, they were seen as â€Å"ill persons†, not criminals, and the government was more concerned about protecting the public from low-quality drugs in its desire to make laws against drug use than they were in sending people to jail for it (Gonzalez). Another reason that the Mexican drug trafficking grew and prospered, coming under the control of what is known today as the drug cartels, is that for a long time the attentions of anti-drug campaigns were focused elsewhere, specifically Columbia. With all of the United States attention focused on bringing down the Columbian cartels, it is only natural that Mexico would be able to â€Å"fly under the radar† of the anti-drug missions and grow unchecked to the size that it is today. However, once the Columbian cartels had been dealt with by the American government, the Mexican cartels took what they had learned, and made their own drug pipeline (â€Å"Losing Ground Against Drugs: The Erosion of America’s Borders† 1997). Now Mexico is considered a major drug producer, as well as a major supplier, both in United States and the world. It is the main foreign supplier of methamphetamine and to the United States, and although Mexico accounts for only a small share of worldwide heroin production, it supplies a large share of heroin consumed in the United States, with an estimated 90% of cocaine ent ering the United States through Mexico (Cook 1). Violence in the border region has begun to spill over and affect Americans, with more than 60 Americans kidnapped in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico as of 2008 (Cook 1). Clearly, this is not the relationship that the United States envisioned with Mexico, though Mexico publicly does not support the actions of the drug cartels, as kidnappings and murders are generally seen as bad on both sides of the border. Today in Mexico, seven known drug cartels operate throughout the country: the Arellano Felix Organization, Beltran Leyva Organization, Los Zetas Cartel, Sinaloa Cartel, Carillo Fuentes Organization, Gulf Cartel/New Federation, and La Familia Michoacana, each with its own fluid area and territory of influence (Cook 3). However, that does not mean that each cartel is content with what they have accomplished, and since there are no fences marked with â€Å"this cartel’s territory here† or â€Å"keep out†, the borders are ofte n fought over. Infighting is common, and an almost immediate result of the rise in the Mexican drug cartels was a spike in violence, not just across the US-Mexican border where the cartels fought the authorities, but within Mexico itself, where the cartels wage turf wars against one another (Cook 13). Drugs are a very dangerous trade in Mexico. One of the biggest reasons for